RSPCA can’t have it both ways

Firstly let me congratulate you on an excellent magazine and for the work you do in promoting shooting and hunting. I am a Field & Game Australia member and as a drought-stricken farmer unfortunately can’t afford to be a SSAA member as well (also, the FGA shooting range at Moama is only about 2km from my place).

My neighbour is a SSAA member and passes your magazines to me when he’s finished with them. In the Australian Shooter’s Journal Vol.15 Issue 1 (November 2018) you quote an RSPCA statement that ‘shooting by itself is not an effective way to significantly reduce animal numbers and is of limited use to achieve long-term control’. If this is the RSPCA’s belief then why do they have a problem with duck shooting if it’s not an effective way to reduce animal numbers?

I think the RSPCA view could be used as an argument to the Game Management Authority in Victoria that there should be a normal season as shooting does not significantly reduce numbers. RSPCA cannot have it both ways - either shooting is an effective way to reduce pest animals and shooters should be encouraged, or it is not effective and there should be a normal duck season in terms of both length and bag limit.

Ray Wilson, NSW


National E-newsletter

The SSAA National E-newsletter is a subscription email service available FREE of charge to SSAA members. It includes current and upcoming news, views and events about firearms ownership, sport shooting and recreational hunting issues, important SSAA news, special offers and time-sensitive news.

Facebook Feed

National Membership

[email protected]

+61 (0) 2 8805 3900

PO Box 282, Plumpton NSW 2761